facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2017 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
ES 2.0 FWD Manual Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
LE 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SE 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SEL 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

2011 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
Man DE FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man ES FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man GTS FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT GTS FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
TC-SST Ralliart AWD Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
Man GSR AWD Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3
TC-SST MR AWD Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

No Data Available: 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Volume

2011 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
Man ES FWD Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3
CVT ES FWD Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3
Man GTS FWD Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3
CVT GTS FWD Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3
TC-SST Ralliart AWD Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2011 vs. 2004

2014 vs. 2005

2016 vs. 2003

2006 vs. 2012

2017 vs. 2009