facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
Man ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man GT FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT GT FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT ES AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SE AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SEL AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan ES Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan ES Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan LS Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution Manual Trunk Volume10.2 ft30.29 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2015 vs. 2017

2009 vs. 2004

2014 vs. 2006

2008 vs. 2005

2011 vs. 2012