facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2017 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
ES 2.0 FWD Manual Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
LE 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SE 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SEL 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan Man DE Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT DE Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan Man ES Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT ES Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan Man ES-Sport Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT ES-Sport Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan Man GTS Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT GTS Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan TC-SST Ralliart Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
4dr Sedan Man GTS Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT GTS Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2012 vs. 2014

2004 vs. 2013

2015 vs. 2017

2016 vs. 2005

2002 vs. 2006