facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2013 Toyota Matrix vs 2004 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Legroom

2013 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
L1.8L I4FWD41.636.2
S2.4L I4FWD41.636.3
S2.4L I4AWD41.636.3

2004 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
1.8L I4FWD41.836.3
1.8L I4AWD41.836.3
XR1.8L I4FWD41.836.3
XR1.8L I4AWD41.836.3
XRS (6 Spd)1.8L I4FWD41.836.3

2013 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
L1.8L I4FWD105.791.9
S2.4L I4FWD105.792.2
S2.4L I4AWD105.792.2

2004 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
1.8L I4FWD106.292.2
1.8L I4AWD106.292.2
XR1.8L I4FWD106.292.2
XR1.8L I4AWD106.292.2
XRS (6 Spd)1.8L I4FWD106.292.2

Go to the Toyota Matrix Legroom Data.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Legroom Side-By-Side by Year

2008 vs. 2006

2003 vs. 2013

2007 vs. 2009

2012 vs. 2004

2010 vs. 2011