facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2012 Toyota Matrix vs 2004 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Legroom

2012 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
L1.8L I4FWD41.636.2
S2.4L I4FWD41.636.3
S2.4L I4AWD41.636.3

2004 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
1.8L I4FWD41.836.3
1.8L I4AWD41.836.3
XR1.8L I4FWD41.836.3
XR1.8L I4AWD41.836.3
XRS (6 Spd)1.8L I4FWD41.836.3

2012 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
L1.8L I4FWD105.791.9
S2.4L I4FWD105.792.2
S2.4L I4AWD105.792.2

2004 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
1.8L I4FWD106.292.2
1.8L I4AWD106.292.2
XR1.8L I4FWD106.292.2
XR1.8L I4AWD106.292.2
XRS (6 Spd)1.8L I4FWD106.292.2

Go to the Toyota Matrix Legroom Data.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Legroom Side-By-Side by Year

2006 vs. 2004

2009 vs. 2011

2013 vs. 2012

2010 vs. 2005

2008 vs. 2007