facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2007 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.4L I44WD39.636.9
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
GT2.4L I4FWD38.536.9
SE2.4L I44WD39.636.9
SEL2.4L I44WD39.636.9

2007 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I438.836.7

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.4L I44WD100.693.7
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
GT2.4L I4FWD97.893.7
SE2.4L I44WD100.693.7
SEL2.4L I44WD100.693.7

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I498.693.2

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2007 vs. 2017

2009 vs. 2006

2002 vs. 2013

2015 vs. 2004

2010 vs. 2012

Popular Headroom Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Lancer vs.)

2019 Chevrolet Cruze

2022 Honda Insight

2024 Mazda 3

2019 Ford Fiesta

2024 Toyota Corolla

2018 Ford Focus