facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2016 Scion iM

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
LS2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD38.836.7

2016 Scion iM

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
1.8L I4FWD39.737.5

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
LS2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD98.693.2

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
1.8L I4FWD100.895.2

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data or the Scion iM Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2015 vs. 2004

2013 vs. 2017

2007 vs. 2008

2010 vs. 2002

2006 vs. 2016

Popular Headroom Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Lancer vs.)

2016 Dodge Dart

2024 Honda Civic

2018 Ford Focus

2017 Buick Verano

2024 Toyota Corolla

2022 Hyundai Accent