facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
Evolution2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
Evolution RS2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
Ralliart2.4L I4FWD39.436.7
SE2.0L I4FWD38.836.7

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.4L I44WD39.636.9
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
GT2.4L I4FWD38.536.9
SE2.4L I44WD39.636.9
SEL2.4L I44WD39.636.9

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
Evolution2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
Evolution RS2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
Ralliart2.4L I4FWD100.193.2
SE2.0L I4FWD98.693.2

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.4L I44WD100.693.7
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
GT2.4L I4FWD97.893.7
SE2.4L I44WD100.693.7
SEL2.4L I44WD100.693.7

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2009 vs. 2008

2007 vs. 2013

2004 vs. 2016

2006 vs. 2005

2017 vs. 2011