facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2015 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
LS2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD38.836.7

2015 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
GT2.4L I4FWD39.636.9
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD39.636.9
SE2.4L I44WD39.636.9
Evolution Final Edition2.0L I4AWD39.636.9
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD40.636.9
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD40.636.9
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD40.636.9

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
LS2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD98.693.2

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
GT2.4L I4FWD100.693.7
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD100.693.7
SE2.4L I44WD100.693.7
Evolution Final Edition2.0L I4AWD100.693.7
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD103.193.7
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD103.193.7
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD103.193.7

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2005 vs. 2012

2003 vs. 2016

2007 vs. 2008

2004 vs. 2013

2014 vs. 2015