facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2013 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
Man DE FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SE AWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man GT FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT GT FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
TC-SST Ralliart AWD Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
Man GSR AWD Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3
TC-SST MR AWD Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3

2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
Man DE FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man GT FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT GT FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SE AWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
TC-SST Ralliart AWD Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
Evolution Man GSR AWD Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3
TC-SST MR AWD Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2017 vs. 2009

2011 vs. 2003

2010 vs. 2012

2004 vs. 2005

2002 vs. 2006