facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2009 Toyota Matrix vs 2003 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

2009 Toyota Matrix

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Wagon Man FWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3
5dr Wagon Auto FWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3
5dr Wagon Man S FWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S FWD Cargo Volume60.9 ft31.72 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S AWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3
5dr Wagon Man XRS FWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3
5dr Wagon Auto XRS FWD Cargo Volume61.5 ft31.74 m3

2003 Toyota Matrix

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Wagon Std Manual Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon Std Auto Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon Std Auto AWD Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon XR Manual Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon XR Auto Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon XR Auto AWD Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon XRS 6-Spd Manual Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon XRS Auto Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3

Go to the Toyota Matrix Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2006 vs. 2008

2012 vs. 2003

2011 vs. 2010

2007 vs. 2004

2013 vs. 2009