facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2005 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan ES Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan ES Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Ralliart Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Ralliart Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution RS Manual Trunk Volume10.2 ft30.29 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution VIII Manual Trunk Volume10.2 ft30.29 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution MR Edition Manual Trunk Volume10.2 ft30.29 m3

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan ES Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan ES Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan LS Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2010 vs. 2016

2011 vs. 2013

2017 vs. 2009

2002 vs. 2006

2012 vs. 2003