facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2010 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan Man DE Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT DE Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan Man ES Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
4dr Sedan CVT ES Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
4dr Sedan Man GTS Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT GTS Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
4dr Sedan Ralliart Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution GSR Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution SE Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution MR Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution MR Touring Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
Man ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man GT FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT GT FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT ES AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SE AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SEL AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

2010 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Sportback Man GTS Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3
5dr Sportback CVT GTS Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3
5dr Sportback Ralliart Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3

No Data Available: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Volume

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2003 vs. 2008

2014 vs. 2013

2011 vs. 2012

2010 vs. 2017

2004 vs. 2015