facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2003 Mercedes-Benz C 230 vs 2000 Mercedes-Benz C 230

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2003 Mercedes-Benz C 230

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
C230 Coupe Trunk Volume9.9 ft30.28 m3
C320 Sport Coupe Trunk Volume9.9 ft30.28 m3
C230 Sedan Manual Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C230 Sedan Automatic Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C240 Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C240 4MATIC Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C320 Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C320 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C320 4MATIC Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C320 Sport Sedan 4MATIC Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C32 AMG Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C240 Wagon Trunk Volume25.2 ft30.71 m3
C240 4MATIC Wagon Trunk Volume25.2 ft30.71 m3
C320 Wagon Trunk Volume25.2 ft30.71 m3
C320 4MATIC Wagon Trunk Volume25.2 ft30.71 m3

2000 Mercedes-Benz C 230

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
C230 Kompressor Sedan Trunk Volume12.9 ft30.37 m3
C280 Sedan Trunk Volume12.9 ft30.37 m3
C43 AMG Trunk Volume12.9 ft30.37 m3

Go to the Mercedes-Benz C 230 Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Easily Compare Specifications Side-By-Side.

Vs.

Compare the Mercedes-Benz C 230 Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2005 vs. 2002

1999 vs. 1998

2006 vs. 2003

2000 vs. 2007

2004 vs. 1997