facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2005 Mercedes-Benz C 230 vs 2002 Mercedes-Benz C 230

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2005 Mercedes-Benz C 230

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
C230 Sport Coupe Trunk Volume9.9 ft30.28 m3
C320 Sport Coupe Trunk Volume9.9 ft30.28 m3
C230 Sport Sedan Manual Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C230 Sport Sedan Automatic Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C240 Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C240 4MATIC Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C320 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C320 Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C320 4MATIC Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C55 AMG Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C240 Wagon Trunk Volume25.2 ft30.71 m3
C240 4MATIC Wagon Trunk Volume25.2 ft30.71 m3

2002 Mercedes-Benz C 230

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
C230 Coupe Trunk Volume15.3 ft30.43 m3
C240 Sedan Trunk Volume15.3 ft30.43 m3
C320 Sedan Trunk Volume15.3 ft30.43 m3
C32 AMG Trunk Volume15.3 ft30.43 m3

Go to the Mercedes-Benz C 230 Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mercedes-Benz C 230 Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

1999 vs. 1998

2000 vs. 2003

1997 vs. 2002

2005 vs. 2006

2007 vs. 2004