facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
ES2.4L I44WD58.34.86148.11.48
ES2.0L I4FWD58.34.86148.11.48
GT2.4L I4FWD58.74.89149.11.49
SE2.4L I44WD58.34.86148.11.48
SEL2.4L I44WD58.34.86148.11.48

2013 Mitsubishi Lancer

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
DE2.0L I4FWD58.74.89149.11.49
ES2.0L I4FWD58.74.89149.11.49
GT2.4L I4FWD58.74.89149.11.49
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD58.74.89149.11.49
SE2.4L I4AWD58.74.89149.11.49
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD58.34.86148.11.48
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD58.34.86148.11.48
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD58.34.86148.11.48
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD59.34.94150.61.51
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD59.34.94150.61.51

Length

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
ES2.4L I44WD182.115.17462.54.62
ES2.0L I4FWD182.115.17462.54.62
GT2.4L I4FWD182.115.17462.54.62
SE2.4L I44WD182.115.17462.54.62
SEL2.4L I44WD182.115.17462.54.62

2013 Mitsubishi Lancer

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
DE2.0L I4FWD18015.0457.24.57
ES2.0L I4FWD18015.0457.24.57
GT2.4L I4FWD18015.0457.24.57
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD18015.0457.24.57
SE2.4L I4AWD18015.0457.24.57
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD17714.75449.64.5
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD17714.75449.64.5
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD17714.75449.64.5
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD180.415.03458.24.58
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD180.415.03458.24.58

Width Without Mirrors

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
ES2.4L I44WD69.45.78176.31.76
ES2.0L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76
GT2.4L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76
SE2.4L I44WD69.45.78176.31.76
SEL2.4L I44WD69.45.78176.31.76

2013 Mitsubishi Lancer

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
DE2.0L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76
ES2.0L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76
GT2.4L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD69.45.78176.31.76
SE2.4L I4AWD69.45.78176.31.76
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD71.35.94181.11.81
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD71.35.94181.11.81
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD71.35.94181.11.81
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76

Wheelbase

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
ES2.4L I44WD103.78.64263.42.63
ES2.0L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63
GT2.4L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63
SE2.4L I44WD103.78.64263.42.63
SEL2.4L I44WD103.78.64263.42.63

2013 Mitsubishi Lancer

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
DE2.0L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63
ES2.0L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63
GT2.4L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD103.78.64263.42.63
SE2.4L I4AWD103.78.64263.42.63
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD104.38.69264.92.65
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD104.38.69264.92.65
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD104.38.69264.92.65
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Vehicle Dimensions Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2013 vs. 2007

2010 vs. 2005

2006 vs. 2004

2009 vs. 2002

2016 vs. 2017

Popular Vehicle Dimensions Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Lancer vs.)

2017 Buick Verano

2022 Honda Insight

2016 Dodge Dart

2020 Chevrolet Sonic

2024 Nissan Sentra

2019 Ford Fiesta