facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
DE2.0L I4FWD58.74.89149.11.49
ES2.0L I4FWD58.74.89149.11.49
GT2.4L I4FWD58.74.89149.11.49
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD58.74.89149.11.49
SE2.4L I4AWD58.74.89149.11.49
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD58.34.86148.11.48
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD58.34.86148.11.48
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD58.34.86148.11.48
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD59.34.94150.61.51
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD59.34.94150.61.51

2008 Mitsubishi Lancer

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
DE2.0L I4FWD58.74.89149.11.49
ES2.0L I4FWD58.74.89149.11.49
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD58.34.86148.11.48
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD58.34.86148.11.48
GTS2.0L I4FWD58.74.89149.11.49

Length

2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
DE2.0L I4FWD18015.0457.24.57
ES2.0L I4FWD18015.0457.24.57
GT2.4L I4FWD18015.0457.24.57
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD18015.0457.24.57
SE2.4L I4AWD18015.0457.24.57
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD17714.75449.64.5
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD17714.75449.64.5
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD17714.75449.64.5
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD180.415.03458.24.58
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD180.415.03458.24.58

2008 Mitsubishi Lancer

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
DE2.0L I4FWD18015.0457.24.57
ES2.0L I4FWD18015.0457.24.57
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD17714.75449.64.5
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD17714.75449.64.5
GTS2.0L I4FWD18015.0457.24.57

Width Without Mirrors

2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
DE2.0L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76
ES2.0L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76
GT2.4L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD69.45.78176.31.76
SE2.4L I4AWD69.45.78176.31.76
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD71.35.94181.11.81
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD71.35.94181.11.81
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD71.35.94181.11.81
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76

2008 Mitsubishi Lancer

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
DE2.0L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76
ES2.0L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD71.35.94181.11.81
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD71.35.94181.11.81
GTS2.0L I4FWD69.45.78176.31.76

Wheelbase

2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
DE2.0L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63
ES2.0L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63
GT2.4L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD103.78.64263.42.63
SE2.4L I4AWD103.78.64263.42.63
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD104.38.69264.92.65
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD104.38.69264.92.65
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD104.38.69264.92.65
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63

2008 Mitsubishi Lancer

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
DE2.0L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63
ES2.0L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD104.38.69264.92.65
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD104.38.69264.92.65
GTS2.0L I4FWD103.78.64263.42.63

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Vehicle Dimensions Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2015 vs. 2009

2004 vs. 2016

2003 vs. 2013

2012 vs. 2010

2008 vs. 2014

Popular Vehicle Dimensions Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Lancer vs.)