Specifications Comparison: 2012 Ford Mustang vs 2013 Ford Mustang

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2012 Ford Mustang

Height

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Height (in)	Height (ft)	Height (cm)	Height (m)
	3.7L V6	RWD	56.1	4.67	142.5	1.43
	3.7L V6	RWD	55.6	4.63	141.2	1.41
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	56	4.67	142.2	1.42
Shelby GT500	5.4L V8	RWD	55.9	4.66	142	1.42
Boss 302	5.0L V8	RWD	55.1	4.59	140	1.4
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	55.8	4.65	141.7	1.42
Shelby GT500	5.4L V8	RWD	55.4	4.62	140.7	1.41

2013 Ford Mustang

Height

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Height (in)	Height (ft)	Height (cm)	Height (m)
	3.7L V6	RWD	56.1	4.67	142.5	1.43
	3.7L V6	RWD	55.6	4.63	141.2	1.41
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	56	4.67	142.2	1.42
Shelby GT500	5.8L V8	RWD	55.9	4.66	142	1.42
Boss 302	5.0L V8	RWD	55.1	4.59	140	1.4
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	55.8	4.65	141.7	1.42
Shelby GT500	5.8L V8	RWD	55.4	4.62	140.7	1.41

Length

2012 Ford Mustang

Length

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Length (in)	Length (ft)	Length (cm)	Length (m)
	3.7L V6	RWD	188.1	15.67	477.8	4.78
	3.7L V6	RWD	188.1	15.67	477.8	4.78
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	188.2	15.68	478	4.78
Shelby GT500	5.4L V8	RWD	188.2	15.68	478	4.78
Boss 302	5.0L V8	RWD	188.1	15.67	477.8	4.78
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	188.2	15.68	478	4.78
Shelby GT500	5.4L V8	RWD	188.2	15.68	478	4.78

2013 Ford Mustang

Length

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Length (in)	Length (ft)	Length (cm)	Length (m)
	3.7L V6	RWD	188.5	15.71	478.8	4.79
	3.7L V6	RWD	188.5	15.71	478.8	4.79
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	188.2	15.68	478	4.78
Shelby GT500	5.8L V8	RWD	188.2	15.68	478	4.78
Boss 302	5.0L V8	RWD	188.5	15.71	478.8	4.79
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	188.2	15.68	478	4.78
Shelby GT500	5.8L V8	RWD	188.2	15.68	478	4.78

Width Without Mirrors

2012 Ford Mustang

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Width W/O Mirrors (in)	Width W/O Mirrors (ft)	Width W/O Mirrors (cm)	Width W/O Mirrors (m)
	3.7L V6	RWD	73.9	6.16	187.7	1.88
	3.7L V6	RWD	73.9	6.16	187.7	1.88
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	73.9	6.16	187.7	1.88
Shelby GT500	5.4L V8	RWD	73.9	6.16	187.7	1.88
Boss 302	5.0L V8	RWD	73.9	6.16	187.7	1.88
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	73.9	6.16	187.7	1.88
Shelby GT500	5.4L V8	RWD	73.9	6.16	187.7	1.88

2013 Ford Mustang

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Width W/O Mirrors (in)	Width W/O Mirrors (ft)	Width W/O Mirrors (cm)	Width W/O Mirrors (m)
	3.7L V6	RWD	73.9	6.16	187.7	1.88
	3.7L V6	RWD	73.9	6.16	187.7	1.88
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	73.9	6.16	187.7	1.88
Shelby GT500	5.8L V8	RWD	73.9	6.16	187.7	1.88
Boss 302	5.0L V8	RWD	73.9	6.16	187.7	1.88
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	73.9	6.16	187.7	1.88
Shelby GT500	5.8L V8	RWD	73.9	6.16	187.7	1.88

Wheelbase

2012 Ford Mustang

Wheelbase

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Wheelbase (in)	Wheelbase (ft)	Wheelbase (cm)	Wheelbase (m)
	3.7L V6	RWD	107.1	8.92	272	2.72
	3.7L V6	RWD	107.1	8.92	272	2.72
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	107.1	8.92	272	2.72
Shelby GT500	5.4L V8	RWD	107.1	8.92	272	2.72
Boss 302	5.0L V8	RWD	107.1	8.92	272	2.72
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	107.1	8.92	272	2.72
Shelby GT500	5.4L V8	RWD	107.1	8.92	272	2.72

2013 Ford Mustang

Wheelbase

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Wheelbase (in)	Wheelbase (ft)	Wheelbase (cm)	Wheelbase (m)
	3.7L V6	RWD	107.1	8.92	272	2.72
	3.7L V6	RWD	107.1	8.92	272	2.72
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	107.1	8.92	272	2.72
Shelby GT500	5.8L V8	RWD	107.1	8.92	272	2.72
Boss 302	5.0L V8	RWD	107.1	8.92	272	2.72
GT	5.0L V8	RWD	107.1	8.92	272	2.72
Shelby GT500	5.8L V8	RWD	107.1	8.92	272	2.72

Go to the Ford Mustang Vehicle Dimensions Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Mustang Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2007 vs. 2009

2004 vs. 2023

2013 vs. 2008

2003 vs. 2005

2015 vs. 2010

timing_belt_kit_shutterstock_1237840495

Post Written By Jackson Briar

Timing Belts Explained: The Critical Function of Timing Belts in Engine Health

car_battery_shutterstock_1100210408

Post Written By Jackson Briar

Which Side Of The Car Battery Is Positive? Decoding the Sides of Your Car Battery

jumpstarting_a_car_shutterstock_551242432

Post Written By Jackson Briar

Jump Starting a Car with a Bad Starter: Is It Possible and How?