Specifications Comparison: 2003 Ford Ranger vs 2010 Ford Ranger

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2003 Ford Ranger

Height

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Height (in)	Height (ft)	Height (cm)	Height (m)
Regular Cab	2.3L	RWD	64.9	5.41	164.8	1.65
Supercab	4.0L V6		67.5	5.62	171.4	1.71
Supercab	V6		64.8	5.4	164.6	1.65

2010 Ford Ranger

Height

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Height (in)	Height (ft)	Height (cm)	Height (m)
Regular Cab XL	2.3L I4	RWD	66.2	5.52	168.1	1.68
Regular Cab XLT (4 Cyl.)	2.3L I4	RWD	66.2	5.52	168.1	1.68
Supercab Sport	4.0L V6	RWD	66.3	5.52	168.4	1.68
Supercab XL	2.3L I4	RWD	66.3	5.52	168.4	1.68
Supercab XLT	2.3L I4	RWD	66.3	5.52	168.4	1.68
Supercab Sport	4.0L V6	RWD	66.3	5.52	168.4	1.68
Supercab XLT	4.0L V6	RWD	66.3	5.52	168.4	1.68

Length

2003 Ford Ranger

Length

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Length (in)	Length (ft)	Length (cm)	Length (m)
Regular Cab	2.3L	RWD	187.5	15.62	476.2	4.76
Supercab	4.0L V6		201.7	16.81	512.3	5.12
Supercab	V6		202.9	16.91	515.4	5.15

2010 Ford Ranger

Length

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Length (in)	Length (ft)	Length (cm)	Length (m)
Regular Cab XL	2.3L I4	RWD	189.4	15.78	481.1	4.81
Regular Cab XLT (4 Cyl.)	2.3L I4	RWD	189.4	15.78	481.1	4.81
Supercab Sport	4.0L V6	RWD	203.6	16.97	517.1	5.17
Supercab XL	2.3L I4	RWD	203.6	16.97	517.1	5.17
Supercab XLT	2.3L I4	RWD	203.6	16.97	517.1	5.17
Supercab Sport	4.0L V6	RWD	203.6	16.97	517.1	5.17
Supercab XLT	4.0L V6	RWD	203.6	16.97	517.1	5.17

Width Without Mirrors

2003 Ford Ranger

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Width W/O Mirrors (in)	Width W/O Mirrors (ft)	Width W/O Mirrors (cm)	Width W/O Mirrors (m)
Regular Cab	2.3L	RWD	69.4	5.78	176.3	1.76
Supercab	4.0L V6		70.3	5.86	178.6	1.79
Supercab	V6		69.4	5.78	176.3	1.76

2010 Ford Ranger

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Width W/O Mirrors (in)	Width W/O Mirrors (ft)	Width W/O Mirrors (cm)	Width W/O Mirrors (m)
Regular Cab XL	2.3L I4	RWD	69.3	5.77	176	1.76
Regular Cab XLT (4 Cyl.)	2.3L I4	RWD	69.3	5.77	176	1.76
Supercab Sport	4.0L V6	RWD	69.4	5.78	176.3	1.76
Supercab XL	2.3L I4	RWD	69.4	5.78	176.3	1.76
Supercab XLT	2.3L I4	RWD	69.4	5.78	176.3	1.76
Supercab Sport	4.0L V6	RWD	69.4	5.78	176.3	1.76
Supercab XLT	4.0L V6	RWD	69.4	5.78	176.3	1.76

Wheelbase

2003 Ford Ranger

Wheelbase

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Wheelbase (in)	Wheelbase (ft)	Wheelbase (cm)	Wheelbase (m)
Regular Cab	2.3L	RWD	111.6	9.3	283.5	2.83
Supercab	4.0L V6		125.9	10.49	319.8	3.2
Supercab	V6		125.7	10.47	319.3	3.19

2010 Ford Ranger

Wheelbase

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	Wheelbase (in)	Wheelbase (ft)	Wheelbase (cm)	Wheelbase (m)
Regular Cab XL	2.3L I4	RWD	111.5	9.29	283.2	2.83
Regular Cab XLT (4 Cyl.)	2.3L I4	RWD	111.5	9.29	283.2	2.83
Supercab Sport	4.0L V6	RWD	125.7	10.47	319.3	3.19
Supercab XL	2.3L I4	RWD	125.7	10.47	319.3	3.19
Supercab XLT	2.3L I4	RWD	125.7	10.47	319.3	3.19
Supercab Sport	4.0L V6	RWD	125.7	10.47	319.3	3.19
Supercab XLT	4.0L V6	RWD	125.7	10.47	319.3	3.19

Go to the Ford Ranger Vehicle Dimensions Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Ranger Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2002 vs. 2011

2008 vs. 2003

2021 vs. 2023

2009 vs. 2020

2004 vs. 2006

happy_family_standing_beside_their_Ford_car_holding_a_large_wad_of_cash_due_to_ford_insurance_savings

Post Written By Jackson Briar

Ford Owners Celebrate: Special Insurance Programs to Cut Costs!

vibrant_and_engaging_digital_illustration_of_a_future_american_electric_car_manufacturing_plant

Post Written By Jackson Briar

Biden's Bold Move Could Make Your Next EV Cost More Than You Think

pile_of_scrap_catalytic_converters_shutterstock_1240093231

Post Written By Jackson Briar

How Much Platinum Is In A Catalytic Converter? Unveiling the Value