facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2003 Dodge Neon vs 2005 Dodge Neon

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2003 Dodge Neon

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
R/T2.0LFWD564.67142.21.42
SE2.0LFWD564.67142.21.42
SRT4 (5 Spd)2.4L I4FWD56.54.71143.51.44
SXT2.0LFWD564.67142.21.42

2005 Dodge Neon

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
SE2.0LFWD564.67142.21.42
SRT4 (5 Spd)2.4L I4FWD564.67142.21.42
SXT2.0LFWD564.67142.21.42

Length

2003 Dodge Neon

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
R/T2.0LFWD173.114.42439.74.4
SE2.0LFWD173.114.42439.74.4
SRT4 (5 Spd)2.4L I4FWD175.714.64446.34.46
SXT2.0LFWD173.114.42439.74.4

2005 Dodge Neon

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
SE2.0LFWD174.414.534434.43
SRT4 (5 Spd)2.4L I4FWD174.414.534434.43
SXT2.0LFWD174.414.534434.43

Width Without Mirrors

2003 Dodge Neon

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
R/T2.0LFWD67.45.62171.21.71
SE2.0LFWD67.45.62171.21.71
SRT4 (5 Spd)2.4L I4FWD67.45.62171.21.71
SXT2.0LFWD67.45.62171.21.71

2005 Dodge Neon

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
SE2.0LFWD67.45.62171.21.71
SRT4 (5 Spd)2.4L I4FWD67.45.62171.21.71
SXT2.0LFWD67.45.62171.21.71

Wheelbase

2003 Dodge Neon

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
R/T2.0LFWD1058.75266.72.67
SE2.0LFWD1058.75266.72.67
SRT4 (5 Spd)2.4L I4FWD1058.75266.72.67
SXT2.0LFWD1058.75266.72.67

2005 Dodge Neon

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
SE2.0LFWD1058.75266.72.67
SRT4 (5 Spd)2.4L I4FWD1058.75266.72.67
SXT2.0LFWD1058.75266.72.67

Go to the Dodge Neon Vehicle Dimensions Data.

Compare the Dodge Neon Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2004 vs. 2003

2005 vs. 2002