facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Pontiac Montana vs 2003 Pontiac Montana

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2002 Pontiac Montana

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
3.4L V6FWD67.45.62171.21.71
Extended3.4L V6FWD68.25.68173.21.73
Extended Luxury3.4L V6FWD68.25.68173.21.73

2003 Pontiac Montana

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
3.4L V6FWD67.45.62171.21.71
Extended3.4L V6FWD68.15.671731.73
Extended Luxury3.4L V6FWD68.15.671731.73

Length

2002 Pontiac Montana

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
3.4L V6FWD187.315.61475.74.76
Extended3.4L V6FWD200.916.74510.35.1
Extended Luxury3.4L V6FWD200.916.74510.35.1

2003 Pontiac Montana

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
3.4L V6FWD187.315.61475.74.76
Extended3.4L V6FWD200.916.74510.35.1
Extended Luxury3.4L V6FWD200.916.74510.35.1

Width Without Mirrors

2002 Pontiac Montana

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
3.4L V6FWD726.0182.91.83
Extended3.4L V6FWD726.0182.91.83
Extended Luxury3.4L V6FWD726.0182.91.83

2003 Pontiac Montana

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
3.4L V6FWD72.76.06184.71.85
Extended3.4L V6FWD726.0182.91.83
Extended Luxury3.4L V6FWD726.0182.91.83

Wheelbase

2002 Pontiac Montana

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
3.4L V6FWD1129.33284.52.85
Extended3.4L V6FWD12110.08307.33.07
Extended Luxury3.4L V6FWD12110.08307.33.07

2003 Pontiac Montana

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
3.4L V6FWD1129.33284.52.85
Extended3.4L V6FWD12110.08307.33.07
Extended Luxury3.4L V6FWD12110.08307.33.07

Go to the Pontiac Montana Vehicle Dimensions Data.

Compare the Pontiac Montana Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2005 vs. 2004

2002 vs. 2003