facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2023 Mazda 3 vs 2016 Mazda 3

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

2023 Mazda 3

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
Mazda 2.5 S2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Carbon Edition2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Carbon Edition2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Preferred2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Premium2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Premium2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Select2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.52.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 Premium Plus2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Carbon Edition2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Carbon Edition2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Preferred2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Premium2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Select2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 Premium Plus2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Carbon Edition2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Carbon Edition2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Preferred2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Premium2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 S Select2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Mazda 2.5 Premium Plus2.5L I4AWD34.810.617.45.3

2016 Mazda 3

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
i GT2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
i Sport2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
i Touring2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
s GT2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
s Touring2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
i GT2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
i Sport2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
i Touring2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
s GT2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
s Touring2.5L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3

Go to the Mazda 3 Turning Radius Data.

Compare the Mazda 3 Turning Radius Side-By-Side by Year

2022 vs. 2019

2017 vs. 2013

2021 vs. 2015

2011 vs. 2018

2016 vs. 2010