facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mazda CX-9 vs 2024 Subaru Ascent

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

2016 Mazda CX-9

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
GT2.5L I4FWD38.811.819.45.9
GT2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9
Signature2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9
Sport2.5L I4FWD38.811.819.45.9
Sport2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9
Touring2.5L I4FWD38.811.819.45.9
Touring2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9

2024 Subaru Ascent

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
Base 8-Passenger2.4L H4AWD38.0
Limited 7-Passenger2.4L H4AWD38.0
Limited 8-Passenger2.4L H4AWD38.0
Onyx Edition 7-Passenger2.4L H4AWD38.0
Onyx Edition Limited 7-Passenger2.4L H4AWD38.0
Premium 7-Passenger2.4L H4AWD38.0
Premium 8-Passenger2.4L H4AWD38.0
Touring 7-Passenger2.4L H4AWD38.0

Go to the Mazda CX-9 Turning Radius Data or the Subaru Ascent Turning Radius Data.

Compare the Mazda CX-9 Turning Radius Side-By-Side by Year

2023 vs. 2016

2018 vs. 2014

2020 vs. 2024

2019 vs. 2008

2017 vs. 2022