facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mazda CX-9 vs 2010 Mazda CX-9

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

2016 Mazda CX-9

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
GT2.5L I4FWD38.811.819.45.9
GT2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9
Signature2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9
Sport2.5L I4FWD38.811.819.45.9
Sport2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9
Touring2.5L I4FWD38.811.819.45.9
Touring2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9

2010 Mazda CX-9

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
GT3.7L V6FWD41.212.620.66.3
GT3.7L V6AWD41.212.620.66.3
Sport3.7L V6FWD41.212.620.66.3
Sport3.7L V6AWD41.212.620.66.3
Touring3.7L V6FWD41.212.620.66.3
Touring3.7L V6AWD41.212.620.66.3

Go to the Mazda CX-9 Turning Radius Data.

Compare the Mazda CX-9 Turning Radius Side-By-Side by Year

2021 vs. 2008

2007 vs. 2020

2022 vs. 2019

2015 vs. 2009

2024 vs. 2010