facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mazda CX-9 vs 2008 Mazda CX-9

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

2016 Mazda CX-9

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
GT2.5L I4FWD38.811.819.45.9
GT2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9
Signature2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9
Sport2.5L I4FWD38.811.819.45.9
Sport2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9
Touring2.5L I4FWD38.811.819.45.9
Touring2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9

2008 Mazda CX-9

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
GT3.7L V6FWD41.212.620.66.3
GT3.7L V6AWD41.212.620.66.3
Sport3.7L V6FWD41.212.620.66.3
Sport3.7L V6AWD41.212.620.66.3
Touring3.7L V6FWD41.212.620.66.3
Touring3.7L V6AWD41.212.620.66.3

Go to the Mazda CX-9 Turning Radius Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mazda CX-9 Turning Radius Side-By-Side by Year

2016 vs. 2014

2019 vs. 2017

2021 vs. 2008

2018 vs. 2007

2024 vs. 2020

Popular Turning Radius Model Comparisons

(Mazda CX-9 vs.)

2024 Toyota Highlander

2024 Kia Telluride

2024 Subaru Ascent

2024 Buick Enclave

2024 Honda Pilot

2024 Volkswagen Atlas