facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2023 Jeep Cherokee

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

2014 Mitsubishi Outlander

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
ES2.4L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
GT3.0L V64WD34.810.617.45.3
GT Touring3.0L V64WD34.810.617.45.3
SE2.4L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
SE2.4L I44WD34.810.617.45.3
SE Touring2.4L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
SE Touring2.4L I44WD34.810.617.45.3
Sport ES2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Sport ES2.0L I44WD34.810.617.45.3
Sport SE2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Sport SE2.0L I44WD34.810.617.45.3

2023 Jeep Cherokee

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
Altitude Lux2.4L I44WD37.711.518.95.8
Trailhawk2.0L I44WD38.111.619.15.8

Go to the Mitsubishi Outlander Turning Radius Data or the Jeep Cherokee Turning Radius Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Outlander Turning Radius Side-By-Side by Year

2005 vs. 2007

2014 vs. 2017

2020 vs. 2023

2021 vs. 2015

2008 vs. 2016

Popular Turning Radius Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Outlander vs.)

2024 Chevrolet Equinox

2024 Subaru Crosstrek

2024 Volkswagen Tiguan

2023 Jeep Renegade

2024 Ford Escape

2024 GMC Terrain