facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2014 Mazda CX-9 vs 2016 Mazda CX-9

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

2014 Mazda CX-9

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
GT3.7L V6FWD37.411.418.75.7
GT3.7L V6AWD37.411.418.75.7
Sport3.7L V6FWD37.411.418.75.7
Sport3.7L V6AWD37.411.418.75.7
Touring3.7L V6FWD37.411.418.75.7
Touring3.7L V6AWD37.411.418.75.7

2016 Mazda CX-9

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
GT2.5L I4FWD38.811.819.45.9
GT2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9
Signature2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9
Sport2.5L I4FWD38.811.819.45.9
Sport2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9
Touring2.5L I4FWD38.811.819.45.9
Touring2.5L I4AWD38.811.819.45.9

Go to the Mazda CX-9 Turning Radius Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mazda CX-9 Turning Radius Side-By-Side by Year

2020 vs. 2010

2014 vs. 2016

2007 vs. 2023

2021 vs. 2024

2017 vs. 2018

Popular Turning Radius Model Comparisons

(Mazda CX-9 vs.)

2024 Honda Pilot

2024 Subaru Ascent

2024 Buick Enclave

2024 Kia Telluride

2024 Dodge Durango

2024 Volkswagen Atlas