facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2024 Mazda CX-5

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

2006 Mitsubishi Outlander

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
Limited2.4L I4FWD39.412.019.76.0
Limited2.4L I4AWD39.412.019.76.0
LS2.4L I4FWD39.412.019.76.0
LS2.4L I4AWD39.412.019.76.0
SE2.4L I4FWD39.412.019.76.0
SE2.4L I4AWD39.412.019.76.0

2024 Mazda CX-5

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
2.5 Carbon2.5L I4AWD36.0
2.5 S Carbon Edition2.5L I4AWD36.0
2.5 S Preferred Package2.5L I4AWD36.0
2.5 S Premium Package2.5L I4AWD36.0
2.5 S Premium Plus Package2.5L I4AWD36.0
2.5 S Select Package2.5L I4AWD36.0
2.5 Premium Package2.5L I4AWD36.0
2.5 Signature2.5L I4AWD36.0

Go to the Mitsubishi Outlander Turning Radius Data or the Mazda CX-5 Turning Radius Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Outlander Turning Radius Side-By-Side by Year

2005 vs. 2017

2008 vs. 2015

2006 vs. 2024

2007 vs. 2014

2019 vs. 2016