facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Legroom

2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
DE2.0L I4FWD42.336.1
ES2.0L I4FWD42.336.1
GT2.4L I4FWD42.336.1
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD42.336.1
SE2.4L I4AWD42.336.1
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD42.533.3
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD42.533.3
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD42.533.3
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD42.335.9
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD42.335.9

2004 Mitsubishi Lancer

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD43.236.6
Evolution2.0L I4AWD4336.6
Evolution RS 5Spd2.0L I4AWD4336.6
LS2.0L I4FWD43.236.6
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD43.236.6
Ralliart2.4L I4FWD43.236.6
Sportback LS2.4L I4FWD43.236.6
Sportback Ralliart2.4L I4FWD43.236.6

2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
DE2.0L I4FWD107.491.7
ES2.0L I4FWD107.491.7
GT2.4L I4FWD107.491.7
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD107.491.7
SE2.4L I4AWD107.491.7
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD10884.6
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD10884.6
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD10884.6
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD107.491.2
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD107.491.2

2004 Mitsubishi Lancer

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD109.793
Evolution2.0L I4AWD109.293
Evolution RS 5Spd2.0L I4AWD109.293
LS2.0L I4FWD109.793
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD109.793
Ralliart2.4L I4FWD109.793
Sportback LS2.4L I4FWD109.793
Sportback Ralliart2.4L I4FWD109.793

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Legroom Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Legroom Side-By-Side by Year

2016 vs. 2009

2013 vs. 2005

2002 vs. 2007

2011 vs. 2003

2017 vs. 2004