facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2010 Toyota Matrix vs 2006 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Legroom

2010 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
1.8L I4FWD41.636.2
S2.4L I4FWD41.636.3
S2.4L I4AWD41.636.3
XRS2.4L I4FWD41.636.3

2006 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
1.8L I4FWD41.836.3
1.8L I4AWD41.836.3
XR1.8L I4FWD41.836.3
XR1.8L I4AWD41.836.3
XRS (6 Spd)1.8L I4FWD41.836.3

2010 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
1.8L I4FWD105.791.9
S2.4L I4FWD105.792.2
S2.4L I4AWD105.792.2
XRS2.4L I4FWD105.792.2

2006 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
1.8L I4FWD106.292.2
1.8L I4AWD106.292.2
XR1.8L I4FWD106.292.2
XR1.8L I4AWD106.292.2
XRS (6 Spd)1.8L I4FWD106.292.2

Go to the Toyota Matrix Legroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Legroom Side-By-Side by Year

2003 vs. 2010

2012 vs. 2008

2009 vs. 2004

2013 vs. 2011

2005 vs. 2007