facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2010 Toyota Highlander vs 2002 Toyota Highlander

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Legroom

2010 Toyota Highlander

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
2.7L I4FWD43.238.329.9
3.5L V6FWD43.238.329.9
3.5L V64WD43.238.329.9
Limited3.5L V6FWD43.238.329.9
Limited3.5L V64WD43.238.329.9
SE3.5L V6FWD43.238.329.9
SE3.5L V64WD43.238.329.9
Sport3.5L V6FWD43.238.329.9
Sport3.5L V64WD43.238.329.9
Electric 3.3L V64WD43.238.4
LimitedElectric 3.3L V64WD43.238.429.9

2002 Toyota Highlander

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
2.4L I4FWD40.736.4
2.4L I44WD40.736.4
3.0L V6FWD40.736.4
3.0L V64WD40.736.4
Limited3.0L V6FWD40.736.4
Limited3.0L V64WD40.736.4

2010 Toyota Highlander

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
2.7L I4FWD109.797.375.9
3.5L V6FWD109.797.375.9
3.5L V64WD109.797.375.9
Limited3.5L V6FWD109.797.375.9
Limited3.5L V64WD109.797.375.9
SE3.5L V6FWD109.797.375.9
SE3.5L V64WD109.797.375.9
Sport3.5L V6FWD109.797.375.9
Sport3.5L V64WD109.797.375.9
Electric 3.3L V64WD109.797.5
LimitedElectric 3.3L V64WD109.797.575.9

2002 Toyota Highlander

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
2.4L I4FWD103.492.5
2.4L I44WD103.492.5
3.0L V6FWD103.492.5
3.0L V64WD103.492.5
Limited3.0L V6FWD103.492.5
Limited3.0L V64WD103.492.5

Go to the Toyota Highlander Legroom Data.

Compare the Toyota Highlander Legroom Side-By-Side by Year

2006 vs. 2022

2010 vs. 2007

2013 vs. 2004

2012 vs. 2011

2005 vs. 2023