facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2012 Toyota Matrix vs 2004 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2012 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
L1.8L I4FWD40.539.3
S2.4L I4FWD40.539.3
S2.4L I4AWD40.539.3

2004 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
1.8L I4FWD40.639.8
1.8L I4AWD40.639.8
XR1.8L I4FWD40.639.8
XR1.8L I4AWD40.639.8
XRS (6 Spd)1.8L I4FWD40.639.8

2012 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
L1.8L I4FWD102.999.8
S2.4L I4FWD102.999.8
S2.4L I4AWD102.999.8

2012 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
1.8L I4FWD103.1101.1
1.8L I4AWD103.1101.1
XR1.8L I4FWD103.1101.1
XR1.8L I4AWD103.1101.1
XRS (6 Spd)1.8L I4FWD103.1101.1

Go to the Toyota Matrix Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2012 vs. 2003

2007 vs. 2006

2008 vs. 2010

2005 vs. 2013

2004 vs. 2009