facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2012 Ford Mustang vs 2018 Ford Mustang

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2012 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
3.7L V6RWD38.836.5
3.7L V6RWD38.534.7
GT5.0L V8RWD38.836.5
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD38.836.5
Boss 3025.0L V8RWD38.534.7
GT5.0L V8RWD38.534.7
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD38.534.7

2018 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
EcoBoost2.3LRWD37.635.7
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD37.635.7
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD37.635.7
EcoBoost2.3LRWD37.634.8
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD37.634.8
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD37.634.8
GT5.0L V8RWD37.634.8
Shelby GT350 R5.2L V8RWD37.634.8
Shelby GT3505.2L V8RWD37.634.8

2012 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
3.7L V6RWD98.692.7
3.7L V6RWD97.888.1
GT5.0L V8RWD98.692.7
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD98.692.7
Boss 3025.0L V8RWD97.888.1
GT5.0L V8RWD97.888.1
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD97.888.1

2012 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
EcoBoost2.3LRWD95.590.7
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD95.590.7
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD95.590.7
EcoBoost2.3LRWD95.588.4
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD95.588.4
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD95.588.4
GT5.0L V8RWD95.588.4
Shelby GT350 R5.2L V8RWD95.588.4
Shelby GT3505.2L V8RWD95.588.4

Go to the Ford Mustang Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Mustang Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2002 vs. 2008

2006 vs. 2017

2020 vs. 2022

2012 vs. 2019

2015 vs. 2021