facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2010 Toyota Matrix vs 2003 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2010 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
1.8L I4FWD40.539.3
S2.4L I4FWD40.539.3
S2.4L I4AWD40.539.3
XRS2.4L I4FWD40.539.3

2003 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
1.8L I4FWD40.639.8
1.8L I4AWD40.639.8
XR1.8L I4FWD40.639.8
XR1.8L I4AWD40.639.8
XRS (AT/6 Spd)1.8L I4FWD40.639.8

2010 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
1.8L I4FWD102.999.8
S2.4L I4FWD102.999.8
S2.4L I4AWD102.999.8
XRS2.4L I4FWD102.999.8

2010 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
1.8L I4FWD103.1101.1
1.8L I4AWD103.1101.1
XR1.8L I4FWD103.1101.1
XR1.8L I4AWD103.1101.1
XRS (AT/6 Spd)1.8L I4FWD103.1101.1

Go to the Toyota Matrix Headroom Data.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2003 vs. 2010

2005 vs. 2011

2007 vs. 2008

2004 vs. 2013

2012 vs. 2006