facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
Evolution2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
Evolution RS2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
Ralliart2.4L I4FWD39.436.7
SE2.0L I4FWD38.836.7

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
DE2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
GTS2.4L I4FWD39.636.9
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD39.636.9

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
Evolution2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
Evolution RS2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
Ralliart2.4L I4FWD100.193.2
SE2.0L I4FWD98.693.2

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
DE2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
GTS2.4L I4FWD100.693.7
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD100.693.7

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2015 vs. 2011

2017 vs. 2007

2003 vs. 2014

2010 vs. 2004

2012 vs. 2013