facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2016 Scion iM

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
Evolution2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
LS2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD38.836.7

2016 Scion iM

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
1.8L I4FWD39.737.5

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
Evolution2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
LS2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD98.693.2

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
1.8L I4FWD100.895.2

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data or the Scion iM Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2009 vs. 2017

2011 vs. 2004

2015 vs. 2005

2003 vs. 2007

2016 vs. 2010

Popular Headroom Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Lancer vs.)

2013 Suzuki SX4

2017 Buick Verano

2024 Mazda 3

2019 Ford Fiesta

2024 Toyota Corolla

2020 Chevrolet Sonic