facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
Evolution2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
LS2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD38.836.7

2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
DE2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
GT2.4L I4FWD39.636.9
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD39.636.9
SE2.4L I4AWD39.636.9
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD40.636.9
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD40.636.9
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD40.636.9
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.8
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD39.636.8

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
Evolution2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
LS2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD98.693.2

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
DE2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
GT2.4L I4FWD100.693.7
Ralliart2.0L I4AWD100.693.7
SE2.4L I4AWD100.693.7
Evolution GSR2.0L I4AWD103.193.7
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD103.193.7
Evolution MR Touring2.0L I4AWD103.193.7
Sportback ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.5
Sportback GT2.4L I4FWD100.693.5

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2009 vs. 2006

2010 vs. 2014

2011 vs. 2002

2013 vs. 2017

2012 vs. 2016

Popular Headroom Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Lancer vs.)

2018 Ford Focus

2024 Nissan Sentra

2024 Subaru Impreza

2024 Hyundai Elantra

2017 Buick Verano

2024 Toyota Corolla