facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
LS2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD38.836.7

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
Evolution2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
Evolution RS2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
Ralliart2.4L I4FWD39.436.7
SE2.0L I4FWD38.836.7

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
LS2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD98.693.2

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
Evolution2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
Evolution RS2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
Ralliart2.4L I4FWD100.193.2
SE2.0L I4FWD98.693.2

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2011 vs. 2009

2005 vs. 2008

2002 vs. 2012

2015 vs. 2007

2014 vs. 2003

Popular Headroom Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Lancer vs.)

2016 Scion iM

2016 Dodge Dart

2017 Buick Verano

2019 Chevrolet Cruze

2019 Ford Fiesta

2024 Mazda 3