facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2010 Land Rover Range Rover

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2002 Land Rover Range Rover

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
4.6 HSE4.6L V84WD38.138.2

2010 Land Rover Range Rover

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
HSE5.0L V84WD39.338.3
5.0L V84WD39.338.3
Sport HSE5.0L V84WD38.538.3
Sport5.0L V84WD38.538.3

2002 Land Rover Range Rover

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
4.6 HSE4.6L V84WD96.897

2002 Land Rover Range Rover

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
HSE5.0L V84WD99.897.3
5.0L V84WD99.897.3
Sport HSE5.0L V84WD97.897.3
Sport5.0L V84WD97.897.3

Go to the Land Rover Range Rover Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Land Rover Range Rover Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2020 vs. 2014

2013 vs. 2007

2017 vs. 2024

2018 vs. 2015

2004 vs. 2003