facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2009 Land Rover Range Rover

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2002 Land Rover Range Rover

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
4.6 HSE4.6L V84WD38.138.2

2009 Land Rover Range Rover

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
HSE4.4L V84WD40.238.3
4.2L V84WD40.238.3
Sport HSE4.4L V84WD39.438.4
Sport4.2L V84WD39.438.4

2002 Land Rover Range Rover

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
4.6 HSE4.6L V84WD96.897

2002 Land Rover Range Rover

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
HSE4.4L V84WD102.197.3
4.2L V84WD102.197.3
Sport HSE4.4L V84WD100.197.5
Sport4.2L V84WD100.197.5

Go to the Land Rover Range Rover Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Land Rover Range Rover Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2018 vs. 2011

2014 vs. 2004

2019 vs. 2024

2002 vs. 2009

2021 vs. 2015