facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2010 Acura MDX vs 2014 Acura MDX

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Gas Tank Size

2010 Acura MDX

Fuel Tank Size

Trim Eng. Drive train Fuel Tank Size (Gal) Fuel Tank Size (L)
Advance3.7L V6AWD21.079.5
Advance DVD3.7L V6AWD21.079.5
3.7L V6AWD21.079.5
Technology3.7L V6AWD21.079.5
Technology DVD3.7L V6AWD21.079.5

2014 Acura MDX

Fuel Tank Size

Trim Eng. Drive train Fuel Tank Size (Gal) Fuel Tank Size (L)
3.5L V6FWD19.573.8
Advance DVD3.5L V6FWD19.573.8
Advance DVD3.5L V6AWD19.573.8
3.5L V6AWD19.573.8
Technology3.5L V6FWD19.573.8
Technology3.5L V6AWD19.573.8
Technology DVD3.5L V6FWD19.573.8
Technology DVD3.5L V6AWD19.573.8

Gas Tank Range

2010 Acura MDX

Fuel Tank Range (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train City (Miles) Highway (Miles) Combined (Miles)
Advance3.7L V6AWD336441388
Advance DVD3.7L V6AWD336441388
3.7L V6AWD336441388
Technology3.7L V6AWD336441388
Technology DVD3.7L V6AWD336441388

2014 Acura MDX

Fuel Tank Range (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train City (Miles) Highway (Miles) Combined (Miles)
3.5L V6FWD390546468
Advance DVD3.5L V6FWD390546468
Advance DVD3.5L V6AWD351526438
3.5L V6AWD351526438
Technology3.5L V6FWD390546468
Technology3.5L V6AWD351526438
Technology DVD3.5L V6FWD390546468
Technology DVD3.5L V6AWD351526438

2010 Acura MDX

Fuel Tank Range (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train City (KM) Highway (KM) Combined (KM)
Advance3.7L V6AWD541710624
Advance DVD3.7L V6AWD541710624
3.7L V6AWD541710624
Technology3.7L V6AWD541710624
Technology DVD3.7L V6AWD541710624

2014 Acura MDX

Fuel Tank Range (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train City (KM) Highway (KM) Combined (KM)
3.5L V6FWD628879753
Advance DVD3.5L V6FWD628879753
Advance DVD3.5L V6AWD565847705
3.5L V6AWD565847705
Technology3.5L V6FWD628879753
Technology3.5L V6AWD565847705
Technology DVD3.5L V6FWD628879753
Technology DVD3.5L V6AWD565847705

Go to the Acura MDX Gas Tank Size Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Acura MDX Gas Tank Size Side-By-Side by Year

2023 vs. 2007

2024 vs. 2017

2016 vs. 2019

2013 vs. 2009

2010 vs. 2002