facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2017 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
ES 2.0 FWD Manual Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
LE 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SE 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SEL 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

2004 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan ES Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan ES Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan LS Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Ralliart Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Ralliart Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution RS Manual Trunk Volume10.2 ft30.29 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution VIII Manual Trunk Volume10.2 ft30.29 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2012 vs. 2008

2013 vs. 2014

2004 vs. 2003

2016 vs. 2002

2006 vs. 2005