facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2017 Cadillac ATS vs 2016 Cadillac ATS

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2017 Cadillac ATS

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2.0L I4 RWD Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.5L I4 RWD Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.0L I4 RWD Luxury Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
3.6L V6 RWD Luxury Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.0L I4 RWD Premium Luxury Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.5L I4 RWD Luxury RWD Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
3.6L V6 RWD Premium Luxury Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.0L I4 RWD Premium Performance Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
3.6L V6 RWD Premium Performance Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.0L I4 AWD Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.0L I4 AWD Luxury Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
3.6L V6 AWD Luxury Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.0L I4 AWD Premium Luxury Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
3.6L V6 AWD Premium Luxury Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3

2016 Cadillac ATS

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2.5L I4 RWD Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.0L I4 RWD Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.0L I4 RWD Luxury Collection Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.0L I4 RWD Performance Collection Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.5L I4 RWD Luxury Collection Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.0L I4 RWD Premium Collection Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
3.6L V6 RWD Luxury Collection Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
3.6L V6 RWD Performance Collection Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
3.6L V6 RWD Premium Collection Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.0L I4 AWD Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.0L I4 AWD Luxury Collection Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.0L I4 AWD Performance Collection Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
2.0L I4 AWD Premium Collection Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
3.6L V6 AWD Luxury Collection Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
3.6L V6 AWD Performance Collection Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3
3.6L V6 AWD Premium Collection Trunk Volume10.4 ft30.29 m3

Go to the Cadillac ATS Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Cadillac ATS Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2015 vs. 2013

2014 vs. 2017

2019 vs. 2018