facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Scion iM vs 2013 Suzuki SX4

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

No Data Available: 2016 Scion iM Trunk Space

2013 Suzuki SX4

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan Man LE FWD Trunk Volume15.5 ft30.44 m3
4dr Sedan CVT LE Popular FWD Trunk Volume15.5 ft30.44 m3
4dr Sedan CVT Sport SE FWD Trunk Volume15.5 ft30.44 m3

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

2016 Scion iM

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr HB Man (SE) Cargo Volume20.8 ft30.59 m3
5dr HB Man (GS) Cargo Volume20.8 ft30.59 m3
5dr HB Man Cargo Volume20.8 ft30.59 m3
5dr HB CVT (SE) Cargo Volume20.8 ft30.59 m3
5dr HB CVT (GS) Cargo Volume20.8 ft30.59 m3
5dr HB CVT Cargo Volume20.8 ft30.59 m3

2013 Suzuki SX4

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr HB CVT Sportback FWD Cargo Volume51.8 ft31.47 m3
5dr HB Man Crossover AWD Cargo Volume54.0 ft31.53 m3
5dr HB CVT Crossover Premium AWD Cargo Volume54.0 ft31.53 m3
5dr HB Man Crossover Technology AWD Cargo Volume54.0 ft31.53 m3
5dr HB CVT Crossover Technology AWD Cargo Volume54.0 ft31.53 m3

Go to the Scion iM Cargo Space Data or the Suzuki SX4 Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.