facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
Man ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man GT FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT GT FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT ES AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SE AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SEL AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

2017 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
ES 2.0 FWD Manual Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
LE 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SE 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SEL 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2008 vs. 2009

2016 vs. 2010

2015 vs. 2013

2006 vs. 2005

2004 vs. 2017