facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2015 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
Man ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man GT FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT GT FWD Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
CVT ES AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SE AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SEL AWC Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

2015 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
Man ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT ES FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
Man GT FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT GT FWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
CVT SE AWD Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
TC-SST Ralliart AWD Trunk Volume9.1 ft30.26 m3
Man GSR AWD Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3
Man Final Edition AWD Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3
TC-SST MR AWD Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2008 vs. 2009

2013 vs. 2006

2017 vs. 2003

2011 vs. 2012

2002 vs. 2004