facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Ford Mustang vs 2006 Ford Mustang

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2016 Ford Mustang

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Fastback V6 Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback EcoBoost Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback EcoBoost Premium Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback GT Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback GT Premium Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback Shelby GT350R Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback Shelby GT350 Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Convertible V6 Trunk Volume11.4 ft30.32 m3
2dr Convertible EcoBoost Premium Trunk Volume11.4 ft30.32 m3
2dr Convertible GT Premium Trunk Volume11.4 ft30.32 m3

2006 Ford Mustang

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Coupe Standard Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe Deluxe Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe Premium Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe GT Deluxe Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe GT Premium Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Convertible Standard Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible Deluxe Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible Premium Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible GT Deluxe Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible GT Premium Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3

Go to the Ford Mustang Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Ford Mustang Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2010 vs. 2023

2004 vs. 2008

1996 vs. 2018

1999 vs. 2021

2009 vs. 2017