facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Ford Mustang vs 2004 Ford Mustang

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2016 Ford Mustang

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Fastback V6 Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback EcoBoost Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback EcoBoost Premium Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback GT Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback GT Premium Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback Shelby GT350R Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback Shelby GT350 Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Convertible V6 Trunk Volume11.4 ft30.32 m3
2dr Convertible EcoBoost Premium Trunk Volume11.4 ft30.32 m3
2dr Convertible GT Premium Trunk Volume11.4 ft30.32 m3

2004 Ford Mustang

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Coupe Standard Trunk Volume10.9 ft30.31 m3
2dr Coupe Deluxe Trunk Volume10.9 ft30.31 m3
2dr Coupe Premium Trunk Volume10.9 ft30.31 m3
2dr Coupe GT Deluxe Trunk Volume10.9 ft30.31 m3
2dr Coupe GT Premium Trunk Volume10.9 ft30.31 m3
2dr Coupe Premium Mach 1 Trunk Volume10.9 ft30.31 m3
2dr Coupe SVT Cobra Trunk Volume10.9 ft30.31 m3
2dr Convertible Deluxe Trunk Volume7.7 ft30.22 m3
2dr Convertible Premium Trunk Volume7.7 ft30.22 m3
2dr Convertible GT Deluxe Trunk Volume7.7 ft30.22 m3
2dr Convertible GT Premium Trunk Volume7.7 ft30.22 m3
2dr Convertible SVT Cobra Trunk Volume7.7 ft30.22 m3

Go to the Ford Mustang Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Mustang Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

1997 vs. 2015

2016 vs. 2021

2002 vs. 2012

2013 vs. 2004

1996 vs. 2020