facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2013 Toyota Matrix vs 2012 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

2013 Toyota Matrix

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Wagon Man L FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Auto L FWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3
5dr Wagon Man S FWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S FWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S AWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3

2012 Toyota Matrix

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Wagon Man L FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Auto L FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Man S FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S AWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3

Go to the Toyota Matrix Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2004 vs. 2003

2008 vs. 2013

2011 vs. 2010

2012 vs. 2006

2009 vs. 2007