facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2012 Ford Mustang vs 2006 Ford Mustang

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2012 Ford Mustang

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Coupe V6 Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Coupe V6 Premium Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Coupe GT Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Coupe GT Premium Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Coupe Boss 302 Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Coupe Shelby GT500 Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Convertible V6 Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible V6 Premium Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible GT Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible GT Premium Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible Shelby GT500 Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3

2006 Ford Mustang

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Coupe Standard Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe Deluxe Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe Premium Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe GT Deluxe Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe GT Premium Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Convertible Standard Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible Deluxe Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible Premium Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible GT Deluxe Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible GT Premium Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3

Go to the Ford Mustang Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Mustang Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2010 vs. 2005

2020 vs. 2012

2000 vs. 2001

2006 vs. 1998

2007 vs. 2011